I noticed this awhile back but saw it again this morning and thought it odd. Really just wondering if anyone else sees this:
When I do "lsblk" which is aliased as "lsblk -fl --sort name" I get this:
The odd thing is two of these "drives" don't exist! There is no sdc or sdd installed on my system. No other tools report them that I've noticed so it must be related to lsblk itself. Also there are two other unused SATA ports which would be sde and sdf but those went to removable devices as one would expect.
It's not really worrisome, but I found it odd.
When I do "lsblk" which is aliased as "lsblk -fl --sort name" I get this:
Code:
stuart@office:~/Downloads$ lsblk
NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS
nvme0n1
nvme0n1p1
nvme0n1p2 swap 1 1ae06117-4c44-450c-b3e5-ceefa4de0d86 [SWAP]
nvme0n1p3 btrfs BLADE1 5964f1aa-2e8e-48e1-a3e3-f2069bd6217c 215.8G 55% /subvol
/home
/
nvme0n1p4 ext4 1.0 vm_drive dd295020-bb4d-4061-9b5f-76333183ab9b 122.1G 65% /mnt/vm_drive
nvme1n1
nvme1n1p1
nvme1n1p2 btrfs 247e6a5b-351d-4704-b852-c50964d02ee6
nvme2n1
nvme2n1p1
nvme2n1p2 btrfs 79f961eb-b2b4-4ab6-a0ca-798e0229bf70
sda
sda1
sda2 btrfs storage 34f7d49b-ebf1-4d06-a899-2de14ee92b5d
sdb
sdb1
sdb2 btrfs root_backup 77de9ade-e3ad-42fb-a400-84493de9827f 380.5G 59% /mnt/root_backup
sdb3 ext4 1.0 vm_backup 38c1cdd4-7ca3-4e34-81e1-4a04f6b6ae78
sdc
sdd
sde
sde1 exfat 1.0 tss_files F7BC-F6B2 49.9G 14% /media/stuart/tss_files
sdf
sdf1 exfat 1.0 travel_docs 7461-F49D
sdg
sdg1 ntfs ineo 0E92D1D079B1C8D8
sr0
It's not really worrisome, but I found it odd.









Comment