I currently have 3 HDs, each 700Gb and running Btrfs, in this laptop. Two are used in a RAID1 configuration and one is my snapshot storage.
I have started experimenting with IPFS and ZeroNet, p2p solutions to Internet censorship. Last night I had 605 peers connected to my IPFS instance. Each can take about 10Mb or more for their web image. When I checked my bandwidth usage before I shut down IPFS there had been about 6Gb into my connection and about 35Gb moved out of my connection to other peers during three hours of usage. Luckily, I have a 60+Mbps connection, soon to be upgraded to 100Mbps, if not 1Gbps. That data is stored in the IPFS repo, which resides at ~/.ipfs. Supposedly, neither Spectrum nor Allo have bandwidth caps, but I suspect that will change if a lot of people start acting as nodes in a P2P network. Spectrum's bandwidth cap history is here. In a chat with an Allo rep he stated that Allo, which is a startup, does not have a bandwidth cap.
Using two of my HDs as RAID1 I suspect that my free disk space will diminish considerably. So, I plan to revert to a system with two HDs forming a single pool, to at least double my free space, while still using the third drive as storage for my @ and @home snapshots.
Here is my setup as it currently is:
[#]P2P[/#]
[#]BTRFS[/#]
I have started experimenting with IPFS and ZeroNet, p2p solutions to Internet censorship. Last night I had 605 peers connected to my IPFS instance. Each can take about 10Mb or more for their web image. When I checked my bandwidth usage before I shut down IPFS there had been about 6Gb into my connection and about 35Gb moved out of my connection to other peers during three hours of usage. Luckily, I have a 60+Mbps connection, soon to be upgraded to 100Mbps, if not 1Gbps. That data is stored in the IPFS repo, which resides at ~/.ipfs. Supposedly, neither Spectrum nor Allo have bandwidth caps, but I suspect that will change if a lot of people start acting as nodes in a P2P network. Spectrum's bandwidth cap history is here. In a chat with an Allo rep he stated that Allo, which is a startup, does not have a bandwidth cap.
Using two of my HDs as RAID1 I suspect that my free disk space will diminish considerably. So, I plan to revert to a system with two HDs forming a single pool, to at least double my free space, while still using the third drive as storage for my @ and @home snapshots.
Here is my setup as it currently is:
Code:
sudo btrfs device usage /
/dev/sda1, ID: 1
Device size: 691.19GiB
Device slack: 0.00B
Data,RAID1: 146.00GiB
Metadata,RAID1: 3.00GiB
System,RAID1: 32.00MiB
Unallocated: 542.15GiB
/dev/sdc, ID: 2
Device size: 698.64GiB
Device slack: 0.00B
Data,RAID1: 146.00GiB
Metadata,RAID1: 3.00GiB
System,RAID1: 32.00MiB
Unallocated: 549.61GiB
sudo btrfs fi show /
Label: none uuid: 12980ae8-4117-4cc5-bbb8-8065e82af93d
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 146.24GiB
devid 1 size 691.19GiB used 149.03GiB path /dev/sda1
devid 2 size 698.64GiB used 149.03GiB path /dev/sdc
sudo btrfs fi usage /
Overall:
Device size: 1.36TiB
Device allocated: 298.06GiB
Device unallocated: 1.07TiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 292.48GiB
Free (estimated): 547.21GiB (min: 547.21GiB)
Data ratio: 2.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 272.50MiB (used: 0.00B)
Data,RAID1: Size:146.00GiB, Used:144.67GiB
/dev/sda1 146.00GiB
/dev/sdc 146.00GiB
Metadata,RAID1: Size:3.00GiB, Used:1.57GiB
/dev/sda1 3.00GiB
/dev/sdc 3.00GiB
System,RAID1: Size:32.00MiB, Used:48.00KiB
/dev/sda1 32.00MiB
/dev/sdc 32.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/sda1 542.15GiB
/dev/sdc 549.61GiB
[#]BTRFS[/#]
It should have been DUP.
Comment