Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

arch-based updates vs. kubuntu updates

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    arch-based updates vs. kubuntu updates

    This isn't a problem to solve, just curiosity on my part. I have run both Manjaro and Archman on QEMU virtual machines, as well as the new Kubuntu 20.04, and I've noticed that the two arch-based distros are way faster at upgrading than Kubuntu, even though they are both on a virtual machine. The package download speed is about the same, I think, but the actual installation process on both Archman and Manjaro is much speedier than on Kubuntu. Any ideas on why this is so?

    #2
    Do you use 'apt' or 'Discover' to update? Arch uses 'pacman', or a script to run it.
    Boot Info Script

    Comment


      #3
      I use an alias or apt, never Discover.

      Comment


        #4
        What about the locations of the servers that the updates are coming from?
        Lenovo Thinkstation: Xeon E5 CPU 32GB ECC Ram KDE Neon

        Comment


          #5
          deb packages likely are running more scripts and post-install things. Also, Debian packages are broken down into smaller bits than others. Even a smaller application may have two or more packages. Kmymoney, for example, has not only a kmymoney package, but also a kmymoney-common package as well. So there are likely more packages to install.

          From memory, arch seemed faster in this regard, and rpms felt slower, though I can't remember f it was zypper or dnf.

          Comment

          Working...
          X