Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Debian-8-jessie-KDE

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dibl
    replied
    Originally posted by marco07 View Post
    Here it is:
    Code:
    marco@Lenovo:~$ inxi -v3
    System:    Host: Lenovo Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 4.8.4) 
               Desktop: KDE 4.14.2 (Qt 4.8.6) Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 8 
    Machine:   System: LENOVO product: 6075A5U v: ThinkCentre M57
               Mobo: LENOVO model: LENOVO
               Bios: LENOVO v: 2RKT64AUS date: 11/24/2011
    CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo E6550 (-MCP-) cache: 4096 KB
               flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 9309 
               Clock Speeds: 1: 2000 MHz 2: 2000 MHz
    Graphics:  Card: Intel 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller
               bus-ID: 00:02.0
               Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
               Resolution: 1280x1024@75.02hz
               GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Q35
               GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
    Network:   Card-1: Broadcom BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller
               driver: b43-pci-bridge bus-ID: 11:0a.0
               IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 00:90:4b:bd:75:e4
               Card-2: Intel 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network Connection
               driver: e1000e v: 2.3.2-k port: 1820 bus-ID: 00:19.0
               IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:1e:37:3b:54:7e
    Drives:    HDD Total Size: 330.0GB (2.2% used) ID-1: model: WDC_WD800JD
               ID-2: model: WDC_WD2500JD
    Info:      Processes: 147 Uptime: 37 min Memory: 740.1/2994.1MB 
               Init: systemd runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2 
               Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.1.28
    OK thanks. It appears to be a totally supported hardware system, as far as Google can find for me. If it is certified for Ubuntu, which is Debian based, I can't imagine that there is a hardware issue running Debian Jessie.

    So, your example problem mentioned Firefox. Have you seen problems with KDE packages? Have any of the crashes taken down the OS? Can you tell more about the issues that you have observed, how they were triggered, whether you are able to repeat them, etc.?

    Leave a comment:


  • Qqmike
    replied
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Snowhog; Jun 16, 2015, 11:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marco07
    replied
    Originally posted by dibl View Post
    If you don't have inxi installed, please (as root)

    Code:
    apt-get update && apt-get install inxi
    Then (as user) in konsole run

    Code:
    inxi -v3
    and paste that output into a reply here. Assuming stable hardware, you should not be having instability problems with Debian Jessie, so something must be mis-configured.
    Here it is:
    Code:
    marco@Lenovo:~$ inxi -v3
    System:    Host: Lenovo Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 4.8.4) 
               Desktop: KDE 4.14.2 (Qt 4.8.6) Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 8 
    Machine:   System: LENOVO product: 6075A5U v: ThinkCentre M57
               Mobo: LENOVO model: LENOVO
               Bios: LENOVO v: 2RKT64AUS date: 11/24/2011
    CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo E6550 (-MCP-) cache: 4096 KB
               flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 9309 
               Clock Speeds: 1: 2000 MHz 2: 2000 MHz
    Graphics:  Card: Intel 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller
               bus-ID: 00:02.0
               Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
               Resolution: 1280x1024@75.02hz
               GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Q35
               GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
    Network:   Card-1: Broadcom BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller
               driver: b43-pci-bridge bus-ID: 11:0a.0
               IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 00:90:4b:bd:75:e4
               Card-2: Intel 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network Connection
               driver: e1000e v: 2.3.2-k port: 1820 bus-ID: 00:19.0
               IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:1e:37:3b:54:7e
    Drives:    HDD Total Size: 330.0GB (2.2% used) ID-1: model: WDC_WD800JD
               ID-2: model: WDC_WD2500JD
    Info:      Processes: 147 Uptime: 37 min Memory: 740.1/2994.1MB 
               Init: systemd runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2 
               Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.1.28
    Last edited by SteveRiley; Jun 12, 2015, 02:11 PM. Reason: added [ CODE ] tags for readability

    Leave a comment:


  • vinnywright
    replied
    Originally posted by oshunluvr View Post
    Similar settings for Chrome...

    chrome://flags/#max-tiles-for-interest-area
    interesting ,,,,,,,chrome is quite fast already,,,,,,,,,the "pipeline" did not change iceweasel however .

    VINNY

    Leave a comment:


  • oshunluvr
    replied
    Similar settings for Chrome...

    chrome://flags/#max-tiles-for-interest-area

    Leave a comment:


  • vinnywright
    replied
    Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
    Enter "about:config" in the URL text of and press Enter.
    Search for "pipeline"
    Double-click on the http pipeline's false box to toggle it to true.
    Change the "4" to "8" as the default minimum.
    Close the tab and browse
    thank you Sir that sounds familiar ,,,,,I will give it a go in a few and report back

    VINNY

    Leave a comment:


  • GreyGeek
    replied
    Enter "about:config" in the URL text of and press Enter.
    Search for "pipeline"
    Double-click on the http pipeline's false box to toggle it to true.
    Change the "4" to "8" as the default minimum.
    Close the tab and browse

    Leave a comment:


  • vinnywright
    replied
    Originally posted by NickStone View Post
    You do know that Iceweasel is Firefox that had been re-branded?
    yes

    VINNY

    Leave a comment:


  • vinnywright
    replied
    Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
    Iceweasel seemed as fast as FF, but I double the pipelining.
    could you instruct me in that procedure please.

    VINNY

    Leave a comment:


  • dibl
    replied
    Originally posted by marco07 View Post
    In my case, things are not as well as yours. I am having crashes every now and then. Ice weasel occasionally crashes during browsing and screen goes dark blank. After any crash, I have no access to logout, restart and shutdown, i.e. these on the luncher menu become non-responsive and I have to Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get to a terminal and power off the system from there. Overall, Debian 8.1, for me, has been unstable. It for sure, again for me, is not Kubuntu in terms of stability.
    If you don't have inxi installed, please (as root)

    Code:
    apt-get update && apt-get install inxi
    Then (as user) in konsole run

    Code:
    inxi -v3
    and paste that output into a reply here. Assuming stable hardware, you should not be having instability problems with Debian Jessie, so something must be mis-configured.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreyGeek
    replied
    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    I must say ,,,that after almost a week of using this Debian-KDE system I can find little difference between it and Kubuntu-14.04 (for me and my usage) after tweaking a few things as usual.
    It dose use slightly less RAM over all ,,,,, Kubuntu will on average be using close to 2Gig's and Debian almost 1Gig ,,,,But with 16Gig available that is nominal .

    web browsing (with a cold weasel ,,O iceweasel) seams a tad slower ,,,,as in page loading ,,,

    VINNY
    It was my observation as well that Debian 8 KDE and Kubuntu were almost indistinguishable. Iceweasel seemed as fast as FF, but I double the pipelining.

    Leave a comment:


  • marco07
    replied
    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    I must say ,,,that after almost a week of using this Debian-KDE system I can find little difference between it and Kubuntu-14.04 (for me and my usage) after tweaking a few things as usual.
    It dose use slightly less RAM over all ,,,,, Kubuntu will on average be using close to 2Gig's and Debian almost 1Gig ,,,,But with 16Gig available that is nominal .

    web browsing (with a cold weasel ,,O iceweasel) seams a tad slower ,,,,as in page loading ,,,still getting around to looking into this one as it is not so slow to be bothersome to me , but slower none the less.

    CPU usage seems to be a bit lighter as well over all ,,,like right now my conky load averages are 0.00 0.06 0.11 where doing the same web browsing in Kubuntu will be somthing like 0.45 ,,,,should actually do something the same in both systems for the same amount of time to check this proper I guess

    VINNY
    In my case, things are not as well as yours. I am having crashes every now and then. Ice weasel occasionally crashes during browsing and screen goes dark blank. After any crash, I have no access to logout, restart and shutdown, i.e. these on the luncher menu become non-responsive and I have to Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get to a terminal and power off the system from there. Overall, Debian 8.1, for me, has been unstable. It for sure, again for me, is not Kubuntu in terms of stability.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteveRiley
    replied
    ice : weasel :: fire : fox

    Leave a comment:


  • NickStone
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    OK so cold weasels dont do things to quick ,,,,,,,,Just installed google chrome and pages load like lightning

    perhaps tweaking iceweasels settings would speed it up ?

    VINNY
    You do know that Iceweasel is Firefox that had been re-branded?

    Leave a comment:


  • vinnywright
    replied
    OK so cold weasels dont do things to quick ,,,,,,,,Just installed google chrome and pages load like lightning

    perhaps tweaking iceweasels settings would speed it up ?

    VINNY

    Leave a comment:

Users Viewing This Topic

Collapse

There are 0 users viewing this topic.

Working...
X