Originally posted by dibl
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I'm on oneiric, but checked the natty repos, liboil0.3 (and qt-sdk) are both available in universe, do you have it enabled?
- Top
- Bottom
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
There are both 32 and 64 bit versions on my system. Here is an rdepends listing...
Maybe adding one of those to your system may pull the library out of the nether regions./usr/lib$ apt-cache rdepends liboil0.3
liboil0.3
Reverse Depends:
gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
psimedia
gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
swfdec-mozilla
swfdec-gnome
python-vipscc
psimedia
nip2
mitools
lives
libvips15
libvips-tools
libswfdec-0.8-0
libswfdec-0.7-1
libquicktime1
gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly
gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3
gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
libschroedinger-1.0-0
liboil0.3-dev
liboil0.3-dbg
gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I like your theory! I'll try it.Originally posted by GreyGeek
Brosix was written using the Qt4 API. liboil is in the latest Qt-SDK. I suspect that you could download and install the version for your archetecthure and then make a link in /usr/lib to ~/QtSDK/Maemo/4.6.2/sysroots/fremantle-arm-sysroot-20.2010.36-2-slim/usr/lib/liboil-0.3.so.0.3.0
BTW, I checked my Kubuntu Natty installation, and that liboil package is not present there either (nor is the qt-sdk package).
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I am running the 64bit Kubuntu Lucid Lynx. Brosix was written using the Qt4 API. liboil is in the latest Qt-SDK. I suspect that you could download and install the version for your archetecthure and then make a link in /usr/lib to ~/QtSDK/Maemo/4.6.2/sysroots/fremantle-arm-sysroot-20.2010.36-2-slim/usr/lib/liboil-0.3.so.0.3.0Originally posted by dibl....
It appears in RPM form for Fedora, and also CentOS and SUSE. It's not in the downloaded Brosix tarball. I've got a feeling it's a "64-bit" problem.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
The only negative thing about Brosix is that it cannot make PC --> phone calls. A minor bummer.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I am looking forward to using THIS feature:
[img width=322 height=400]http://www.brosix.com/images/features/screensharing_start.png[/img]
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
It is in my Lucid/main archive. It is the optimized inner loops library.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
Bummer. A search in all Debian packages gave me this:
It appears in RPM form for Fedora, and also CentOS and SUSE. It's not in the downloaded Brosix tarball. I've got a feeling it's a "64-bit" problem.You have searched for packages that names contain liboil-0.3.so.0 in suite(s) stable, all sections, and all architectures.
Sorry, your search gave no results
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
@GG, you sucked me in -- I'll try it. However:
I'm going to go rooting through the Debian repos to see if I can find that library.Code:don@aptosidbox:~/Brosix$ pwd /home/don/Brosix don@aptosidbox:~/Brosix$ ls Brosix Brosix.bin config.ini libs plugins sounds themes don@aptosidbox:~/Brosix$ ./Brosix <program name unknown>: error while loading shared libraries: liboil-0.3.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory don@aptosidbox:~/Brosix$ sux Password: root@aptosidbox:/home/don/Brosix# apt-cache policy liboil-0* liboil-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version table: root@aptosidbox:/home/don/Brosix#

- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I downloaded the Linux client from here.
Ark opened it nicely and I extracted the Brosix directory to my home account. Then I edited the menu to place a entry linking to /home/jerry/Brosix/Brosix (NOT Brosix.bin). I clicked on my menu entry and was greeted with the login/create new account dialog. I created a new account. My account name is GreyGeek. If anyone else has installed it give me a call. I am on line and waiting. I am really anxious to check this thing out.
An aside: Blink and Ekiga are GPL. Brosix is proprietary. How long Linux users will have access to a free version is anyone's guess. BUT, there are SO MANY GREAT FEATURES I'm willing to try it (while still maintaining my Blink and Ekiga clients). I especially like the "Share your screen" AND the remotely access the other screen, VNC style.
OK. GreyGeek is waiting for any other willing adventurer to give him a call! 8)
EDIT: Opps! When you log into their Web Client while you have your local client running it disconnects your local client.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
My take on that (although I may be wrong) is that they are referring to the processor eg no arm/risc etc - presumably as a result of Linux supporting so many architectures.Originally posted by GreyGeekI checked out Brosix. It offers a free Linux client BUT:
I am assuming that by "Intel Linux computers" they mean computers that use Intel video chips.System Requirements:
Brosix for Linux is available for Intel Linux computers (no other platforms supported) and requires Linux Kernel 2.6 or higher.
It's great that there are so many choices available - now everyone must decide on how best to get the same one
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
I checked out Brosix. It offers a free Linux client BUT:
I am assuming that by "Intel Linux computers" they mean computers that use Intel video chips.System Requirements:
Brosix for Linux is available for Intel Linux computers (no other platforms supported) and requires Linux Kernel 2.6 or higher.
I watched the demo video and one of the many features is the ability to control another computer running Brosix remotely, in addition to sharing screens. There is also a web version that doesn't require installing any software, but you still have to create an account.
I am going to bite the bullet and give it a try. (the article you linked closed with the author wishing brosix had recording capability. That leads me to a short discussion of Blink and Ekiga:
Blink has a record button, Eikiga does not. Blink is much faster than Ekiga starting up, shutting down, and in use. Using the same audio codecs they give the same voice quality which, at 16KHz, is EXCELLENT. Ekiga can open a video window if both users have webcams. Blink's video capability is in the future, but how far only Blink developers know. Ekiga does NOT have a "share your screen" feature.
Both Blink and Ekiga have PC-to-phone capability. I signed up for phone access on both accounts. Ekiga's base charge is $15 US. Blink charges $23.80 US (3.80 VAT charge). BOTH services are by Diamond.us, but they have different proxy URLs. Both admin website, although significantly different are adequate. Blink's is laid out with tabs in the upper right corner. Ekiga's has the tradition left column descriptions. Ekiga has slightly more detail.
Phone numbers are entered into Blink via a user's GMail Contacts list, making care that after you enter a contact's name you enter + and the country code in front of their number, i.e., +1402429257 If you make changes to GMail's Contact list then the next time you fire up Blink it will reload the list. IF you have Blink running when you modify your GMail Contact list you will notice within a minute or two that Blink's Contact list has been modified.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
- http://ht.ly/1cCmyfBrosix: A business-oriented Skype alternative with Linux client
LXer user Tracyanne, via Curt Howland's blog post, let me know about Brosix, which though still a proprietary technology does offer an alternative to Skype that's aimed at businesses and features Linux client software that isn't inferior (like that of Skype) to its Windows and Mac offerings.
The service is free for personal use and reasonable for businesses.
Video chat, voice chat, instant messaging, a virtual whiteboard, screen-sharing, screenshots, file transfer -- it's all part of the service.
Tracyanne seemed to say that Brosix was interested in getting its Linux client software into the repositories of Linux distributions. Haven't seen that yet. If anybody knows of a distro that packages Brosix, please let me know.
Now if I can only figure out how to easily record both sides of a Brosix voice chat, we're in business.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
So far I have tested QuteCom, Twinkle, Blink, Ekiga, OpenMeeting, gizmo5, and Kphone.
From a previous use of Ekiga I still had an account on the ekiga.net domin. The new, and very much improved version of Ekiga had no problems connecting to that account. Ekiga video display is not as sharp as Skype's, but it is usable. It seems faster than Skype. Ekiga now offers access to landline and cellphone for charges similar to Skype's using a service by Diamoncard.us, the same service that Blink uses.
Ekiga and Blink offer VOIP server accounts for free usage and for charged landline and cellphone calls. Blink uses sip2sip.info and Ekiga uses ekiga.net.
Diamondcardus, the service for making landline and cellphone calls, sends instructions on the settings that allow a connection for Twinkle and Ekiga to their service. Those instructions are useful for the other VIOP clients.
Blink, also GPL'd, seems to be the best for chat and voice. It's configuration has space for video codecs but none has been supplied. Apparently they are coming "soon".
Gizmo5 just didn't work right.
QuteCom was very good and included video. I just couldn't get it connected to my ekiga.net account.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Bye Bye Skype for Linux?
Linux is a Microsoft platform, don't you know?Originally posted by GreyGeek...
Notice that he does not mention Linux. His "non-Microsoft platforms" is in the context of "communication", i.e., smartphones. So, it appears that Skype for iOS and Android will continue, but a binary for PCs running Linux? Not a word.....
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
Users Viewing This Topic
Collapse
There are 0 users viewing this topic.
Leave a comment: