If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you have copied text output that contains formatting (colors, highlighting, etc.), please do not enclose it in QUOTE or CODE tags. Just right-click your mouse and choose "Paste Without Formatting" or similar (Paste as plain text).
I found this very interesting, and informative ... I had no idea:
That H.264 is patent-encumbered? Neither did I. Video codecs is a messy business already, and I am a bit confused about what is actually patented even after reading the Wikipedia article.
Mozilla and Firefox continue to stand with the web on this topic. We don’t think that fundamental web technologies should be encumbered with patents and our actions and messages reflect that.
As explained in the first article, the problem is not today's relatively liberal licensing terms for H.264, it is the potential "surprise" new terms once H.264 attains something like "mandatory" status for 'net streaming content transfers.
Comment