Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
krusader!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
If someone was handy with alien (I am, but am not at home) there's a 2.5.0 Fedora build here - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...buildID=812411
- Top
- Bottom
-
Right moused on the xenial offering linked to by archeron and downloaded the deb. Used QApt from Dolphin to install it.
Initial testing by just browsing around....
Krusader also offers the ability to install deb files by using QApt Package Installer.
WOW! Everything in MC is in Krusader plus more!
FAST! Maybe it is because 16.04 is about twice as fast on my Acer as 14.04 was, but Krusader appears to be as fast as MC.
Unless I run into some ugly installation crashing bug Krusader is a keeper!Last edited by GreyGeek; Oct 26, 2016, 12:45 PM.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
krusader!
Originally posted by acheron View PostA very big 'I HAVE NOT TESTED' and 'USE AT YOUR OWN RISK' warning on this, but.......
https://launchpad.net/~blaze/+archiv...ilter=krusader
Sithlord48: I love Dolphin, but I also like to have more than one tool in my bag. I used Krusader years ago but it disappeared. Working at the CLI level is a PITA, especially when it gets difficult to remember the options and switches for a utility. MC is a CLI GUI just a step above the CLI, but not as smooth as a Qt API GUI. The real test, for me, of Krusader is if it is significantly faster than Dolphin in things like mass copies, moves or deletions.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
why not just use dolphin? it does all this stuff also.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreyGeek View PostTook a look at the 2.5 version and evaluated what I'd have to install. 73 packages, including lots of dev packages. Decided not to compile it and wait for a binary coming down the pipe. I've got mc, which is lightening fast, so that should keep me till then.
https://launchpad.net/~blaze/+archiv...ilter=krusader
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreyGeek View PostI have downloaded it and will take a look at it. Doing the configure/make/make compile/make install doesn't bother me but many of these source code files have incomplete make files and do not include an "uninstall" section that works, so one is compelled to examine the install section and manually back out the libraries and binaries. If it has a good uninstall section I'll give it a go.
https://wiki.debian.org/CheckInstall
Took a look at the 2.5 version and evaluated what I'd have to install. 73 packages, including lots of dev packages. Decided not to compile it and wait for a binary coming down the pipe. I've got mc, which is lightening fast, so that should keep me till then.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Took a look at the 2.5 version and evaluated what I'd have to install. 73 packages, including lots of dev packages. Decided not to compile it and wait for a binary coming down the pipe. I've got mc, which is lightening fast, so that should keep me till then.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vinnywright View Postlooks like the 2.4.0 ver is what we have in Neon ,,,,,,
Code:vinny@vinny-Bonobo-Extreme:~$ apt search krusader Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done krusader/xenial 1:2.4.0~beta3-2ubuntu1 amd64 twin-panel (commander-style) file manager
VINNY,,,, all the depends were already installed @hear ,,,,,,,,,,,,going thrugh the "Suggested packages" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Code:These packages are optional but they will make Krusader much more powerful and useful. The next packages are the names that Debian/Ubuntu uses, other Linux distros will probably use similar names.
VINNY
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wizard10000 View PostI didn't compile it, I snagged it from Sid repos. Still trying to decide whether I want to compile 2.5 or wait for Debian to do it
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vinnywright View Postlooks like the 2.4.0 ver is what we have in Neon ,,,,,,
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreyGeek View PostPretty reasonable options available.
So, you downloaded the tar and did a
[configure]configure & make & make compile[/console]
Why the older one and not the 2.5 ?
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
looks like the 2.4.0 ver is what we have in Neon ,,,,,,
Code:vinny@vinny-Bonobo-Extreme:~$ apt search krusader Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done krusader/xenial 1:2.4.0~beta3-2ubuntu1 amd64 twin-panel (commander-style) file manager
VINNY
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Pretty reasonable options available.
So, you downloaded the tar and did a
[configure]configure & make & make compile[/console]
Why the older one and not the 2.5 ?
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreyGeek View PostI had to rub my eyes to be sure that they weren't deceiving me, but that looks EXACTLY like a gui version of Midnight Commander, down to identically named buttons!
When you right mouse click on various types of files what context sensitive options are offered in the popup?
krusader is mime-aware; it uses KDE's default applications thingamabob. I did notice when I opened a text file it opened with geany instead of kate, but kate was in the "open with" options.
Screenshot of context menu - small thumbnail, opens to 1920x1080 -
Last edited by wizard10000; Oct 25, 2016, 12:39 PM.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
I had to rub my eyes to be sure that they weren't deceiving me, but that looks EXACTLY like a gui version of Midnight Commander, down to identically named buttons!
When you right mouse click on various types of files what context sensitive options are offered in the popup?
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: