Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loading Kubuntu 12.04 onto a laptop

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Catching up, I'll answer and comment in order.

    Originally posted by Keith Sayers View Post
    It appeared on screen as a Basic partition rather than extended which bothered me and I was trying to convert it from Basic to Extended - with the intent of then creating within it two more partitions
    Minor terminology correction, if I may. There's no such thing as a "basic partition." The Windows-specific designations of basic or dynamic disks refer to which configuration the Windows disk manager uses to lay down partitions. Dynamic disks support volumes that span multiple physical drives; basic disks do not. (Unfortunately, there is a fair amount of sloppiness used online; even the Wikipedia article refers to "basic partition.") Outside of Windows, you won't see the basic/dynamic disk terminology. When configuring a system to boot multiple operating systems, you should use only basic disks -- it'll make your life much easier. While it's possible to manipulate volumes and partitions on dynamic disks using utilities in the dmraid package, it tends to be laborious and unpredictable.

    Originally posted by Keith Sayers View Post
    How do you work that out, please, and why should it be so?
    Look at the starting and ending sector numbers for your earlier partition scheme:
    Code:
    Device     Boot  Start      End        Blocks      Id  System
    /dev/sda5        771973120  976771071  102398976   83  Linux
    /dev/sda6        433852416  763594751  164871168   83  Linux
    /dev/sda7        763596800  771971071  4187136     82  Linux swap / Solaris
    These indicate the physical start and end of each partition on the disk.

    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    I don't quite know how that 139Gig NTFS partition /sda5 got in your extended partition ?maby the installer did it?
    Yeah, I was wondering that, too. I never allow the partitioner to make its own decisions, I wonder what it did here?

    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    don't worry about what you asked in post#14 as the partitions have changed sense @SteveRiley made that comment and are now contiguous and numbered correctly
    Indeed. Looks like you're all set, Keith.

    Comment

    Working...
    X